Jess M. Holle wrote:
> I also find the current 'httpd-ldap' sub-project status lamentable --
> though at least at 2.0.40 it builds (but has to be patched to run on
> Windows!) and includes instructions for making it part of your Apache 2
> build process (on UNIX).
That's because all the integration into v2.0 was done by me, and I know
nothing about windows.
It's up to the windows guys to step forward and fix this, I can't I'm
afraid, sorry.
> Worse, it has scared off the original www.rudedog.org folk from
> maintaining it -- leaving critical LDAP authentication functionality in
> limbo.
If it's in an ASF tree then in theory it's ASF supported (which it is,
there are people here who have committed code). The rudedog guys
certainly have no obligation to support it, although their involvement
and experience would be a really good thing.
Regards,
Graham
--
-----------------------------------------
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"There's a moon
over Bourbon Street
tonight..."
