On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 08:43:33AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > I dislike backporting things. I think we all need to be on the 'same > version.' Heck, we have committers who refuse to use 2.0 ("it's not > portable"). If we go to 2.1, then I want to see 2.0 closed for > anything other than security fixes. > > I don't think we have enough of a community to continue active > development on two separate (but similar) trees. I don't want to > start 2.1 and still see everyone adding features to 2.0. -- justin
No, that's exactly the problem we have with 1.3 right now. There *are* people who are willing to backport fixes and even features to the 1.3 tree, it's only a faction of the group here that *doesn't* want that to happen. I see no reason to close any httpd source tree. If it's just one person complaining that they don't want to backport their changes, then they shouldn't do it. This is a volunteer organization, do only what you want to do, but don't prevent anyone else from have the same abilities. -aaron