Re: 2.0/2.1 split was Re: authn/authz split

[Dirk-Willem van Gulik]

On Fri, 30 Aug 2002, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:

> I don't think we have enough of a community to continue active
> development on two separate (but similar) trees.  I don't want to
> start 2.1 and still see everyone adding features to 2.0.  -- justin

Why not do a tiny temporary branch just for those features; and you merge
that branch in once we're done. That branch would only need to touch a
fraction of the files - so the merge back in should not be too painful.

Dw