On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > > On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Chris Taylor wrote: > > > > > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > > > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > > > > > > > > [ ] Check in aaa rewrite to 2.0. > > > > > > [X] Check in aaa rewrite to 2.1. > > > > > > > > > > My view is that it's important to keep 2.0 stable to attract new > > > > > users, and breaking things all the time won't help :) > > > > > > > > Can I ask a stupid question? What have we actually broken since Apache > > > > 2.0 went GA? Binary compatibility? How many functions? How many of > > > > those were APR and not Apache? > > > > > > Sure, both source and binary compatibility were broken numerous times. > > > Check the PHP bug database for umpteen reports on each breakage. > > > > Okay, but how is that different from early releases of 1.3? > > I don't know, but you asked the question which sort of implied that > nothing had been broken.
Okay, I was actually trying to imply that while we had broken stuff, we hadn't broken that much, and that some modules would actually still work (Except for the MMN). Ryan _______________________________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] 550 Jean St Oakland CA 94610 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
