On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 03:34:51PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > Please vote: > > [X] Check in aaa rewrite to 2.0. > [ ] Check in aaa rewrite to 2.1.
---------------------- > Please realize that I don't think it's possible to maintain > backwards compatibility due to the relevant Authoritative directives. > So, a vote for 2.0 means it is okay to break backwards compatibility. I think a carefully placed hack will fix the Authoritative stuff. :-) For example, have mod_auth_basic define the directive, and have it alter its dispatch to the different authn backends. You can certainly deprecate the directive, but I bet it can end up working okay. > Everyone is encouraged to vote. I believe majority wins since this > isn't a code vote, but a policy one. (But, if someone says that > vetos apply, fine, but we may end up with dueling vetos - which then > doesn't help anyone.) At this level, it is policy, so majority wins. When you check in code that breaks the system, then a technical veto can arise. So you could always state that this is advisory only :-) Cheers, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
