On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 01:24:38PM +0200, Mads Toftum wrote: > On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 01:07:38PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote: > > It's easy enough to create a 2.1 branch in CVS and developing the new auth > > stuff there until it's stable. then syncing changes done in the 2.0 stuff in > > and releasing 2.1 seems fair to me, opposed to destabilizing the whole 2.0 > > tree now. > > I don't think people are talking about branching here - the 2.1 solution would > be a new repository.
you are wrong. read the last days mails again. this decision is delayed. if a majority wants 2.0 it's obsolete anyway.
