Peter Van Biesen wrote: >If you are talking about the memory leak when downloading large files >through a proxy chain, this problem was first observed in version >2.0.39, so it probably isn't the same problem. >
2.0.39 definitely would have had problems with large requests due to the way its content-length filter worked. Different part of the code, but the same basic problem: setting aside arbitrarily large amounts of data. Brian
