> From: Greg Stein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 17 September 2002 20:31
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 12:56:21PM +0200, Sander Striker wrote: > > > From: Mads Toftum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: 17 September 2002 12:38 > > > > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 03:41:15AM +0200, Sander Striker wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I've tagged and rolled 2.0.41. Please test the tarballs found > > > > at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ and cast thy votes. > > > > > > > One very small issue when building (tested on solaris 8 sparc) with > > > ssl_expr_parse.y in modules/ssl. Given that the timestamp on that file > > > is newer than on the output files, then make wants to run them through > > > yacc again. Looking at the timestamps it seems that ssl_expr_parse.y > > > has been updated by buildconf. Updating the timestamp on the output > > > files makes apache build cleanly without yacc. > > > > Grmpf. Should we modify httpd_roll_release to touch the output files? > > > > Samder > > Hey "Samder"... Yes, +1 on tweaking httpd_roll_release to touch the files. Bah, I can't even spell my own name ;) > I would also recommend a new tarball with the timestamp tweaked. Something > like so: > > $ tar xzf httpd-....tar.gz > $ touch .../ssl_expr_parse.c > $ tar czf httpd-....tar.gz httpd-... > > That's gonna affect the tarball's MD5 signature tho. And the PGP signatures. Do I hear objections against that? Sander
