> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 17 September 2002 20:44
>>> I would also recommend a new tarball with the timestamp tweaked. Something >>> like so: >>> >>> $ tar xzf httpd-....tar.gz >>> $ touch .../ssl_expr_parse.c >>> $ tar czf httpd-....tar.gz httpd-... >>> >>> That's gonna affect the tarball's MD5 signature tho. >> >> And the PGP signatures. Do I hear objections against that? > > Just on the basic premise that the tarball has been released. At this > point, it is available for users. If we are going to create new tarballs, > then must have a new name. *sigh* Ofcourse you are right. So, what do we do, stick with 2.0.41 or retag APACHE_2_0_42 to be the same as APACHE_2_0_41 and reroll? Sander
