At 10:49 PM 1/26/2003, Aaron Bannert wrote: >On Saturday, January 25, 2003, at 11:52 PM, Harrie Hazewinkel wrote: >>Just another thing comes to mind. How about CVS access?? >>I beleibe if people are willing to work on this a seperate CVS >>repository would allow quicker people to develop on it. >>People working on the pop module, do not neccessarly have and >>get CVS access to the httpd reposotory and in such a case >>the POP development is depending on people who have CVS access >>to httpd. >> >>This is a practical matter, but IMHO valid. > >Actually, I think this is a great point and I agree. >A decoupling of the modules from the core will IMHO >encourage more independent development and probably >encourage better interfaces as well.
A very good point, indeed... if we do not have snapshots available, it seems like it's time to do so (Daniel already checked, it compiles :-) And if some folks want a release, I suppose we could even go so far as to tag and roll a candidate. Bill
