Jim Jagielski wrote:
Erik Abele wrote:
Perhaps there is not much interest because it is somewhat 'hidden'?
IMHO mod_pop3 would gain more visibility and therefore perhaps a
better community when folded into httpd. Imagine windoze users:
they mostly rely on binary distributions and up to now there are
just the sources around. If mod_pop3 gets used more widely, there
probably will be also more developers who will be attracted to
contribute.
Leaving it in it's own repo-module as it is now, without any person
in charge of it, will let it die on the long run.
Personally I'm +/-0 towards folding it into httpd, since I won't
have the time to contribute...just my 2c.
Once again, I'm +1 in getting it moved in. It's an example of an
protocol module. It's a good module. It's a worthwhile module. It
would benefit from more people working on it, and people are
interested in doing so.
Well, than let's move it in. A quick overview of the last mails shows the following votes:
justin +0 modules/pop3
jim +1 modules/experimental
bills -0 !modules/pop3
willrowe -0 modules/experimental / +0 modules/pop / +1 for it's current repository
plus some positive votes from Daniel Lopez, Thomas Eibner, Harrie Hazwinkel and Chris Taylor.
As far as I'm concerned I will change my +/-0 to a +1 and would like to see it in modules/experimental.
Perhaps we should have a binding vote and then proceed? What has to be done? As Jim pointed out, the licence issues so far are intact...
cheers,
erik
