Erik Abele wrote:
> 
> 
> Perhaps there is not much interest because it is somewhat 'hidden'? IMHO mod_pop3 
>would gain more visibility and therefore perhaps a better community when folded into 
>httpd. Imagine windoze users: they mostly rely on binary distributions and up to now 
>there are just the sources around. If mod_pop3 gets used more widely, there probably 
>will be also more developers who will be attracted to contribute.
> 
> Leaving it in it's own repo-module as it is now, without any person in charge of it, 
>will let it die on the long run.
> 
> Personally I'm +/-0 towards folding it into httpd, since I won't have the time to 
>contribute...just my 2c.
> 

Once again, I'm +1 in getting it moved in. It's an example of an
protocol module. It's a good module. It's a worthwhile module. It
would benefit from more people working on it, and people are
interested in doing so.

-- 
===========================================================================
   Jim Jagielski   [|]   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   [|]   http://www.jaguNET.com/
      "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
             will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson

Reply via email to