On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, David Burry wrote: > are we talking about removing modules entirely, or just modifying what's > enabled by default?
I'm only talking about what's enabled by default, and, I was really only talking about mod_imap. The comment about mod_asis was probably unwarranted. I think that there are probably people that use mod_asis. I don't think you could find anyone using mod_imap, and I don't think you could find a dozen who know what it is. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Justin Erenkrantz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2003 8:39 PM > Subject: Re: Proposal: Remove mod_imap from default list > > > > --On Sunday, March 9, 2003 6:48 PM -0500 Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > 2. If we want to keep our contract with the user about the stable series > > > valid, this change should go into 2.1 only. Otherwise, users doing a > > > "configure; make; make install" or even a "config.status" could get a > > > nasty surprise. > > > > +1. 2.1 is the right place to tweak module default values. And, it's > also > > the place to remove modules entirely... 1.3 and 2.0 shouldn't change. -- > > justin > > > > -- Pilgrim, how you journey on the road you chose To find out where the winds die and where the stories go --Pilgrim (Enya - A Day Without Rain)
