On Wed, 2004-02-25 at 00:15, Cliff Woolley wrote: > On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Joe Orton wrote: > > > I wasn't sure whether or not this EOC bucket type should go in APR-util > > or httpd. Filtering gurus, what say ye? That bit looks OK to me > > otherwise with a licence header added to the new file. > > I say httpd.
+1. There is probably still some cleanup left to do in apr/apr-util of things that are only applicable to httpd. See the comments in the xml code, which are focused a lot on the mod_dav code for example. Not something to worry about too much at this point though, other than keep new httpd specific code in httpd. Sander
