* Bill Stoddard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Joshua Slive wrote: > > Didn't we decide in the move to 2.0 that all directives would take an > > argument? > Maybe I wasn't paying attention. > > > Win32DisableAcceptex seems to work just by being present in the > > config with no argument. > True. > > > Shouldn't it instead be Win32DisableAcceptex on|off > To be more consistent with EnableSendFile on|off, et. al? Hadn't considered > that but it makes sense.
So what can we do? Change it in 2.1 to EnableAcceptEx On|Off (default on)? nd
