Do we care about backporting the overhaul into the 2.0 tree?  I
don't see that it really buys us anything unless you think that it is
necessary in order to get auth_ldap out of experimental.  After I get
the latest util-ldap fixes backported, that should get mod_auth_ldap
working in 2.0.  Once it actually works, I think we can then propose
that it is moved out of experimental.  
    The next thing that needs to be done would be to rework
mod_auth_ldap so that it complies with the rest of the 2.1 auth module
structure.    The util-ldap overhaul could be considered part of that
work and only be available in 2.1.  Thoughts?

Brad

Brad Nicholes
Senior Software Engineer
Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions
http://www.novell.com 

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tuesday, August 03, 2004 7:09:01 PM >>>
minfrin     2004/08/03 18:09:01

  Modified:    .        Tag: APACHE_2_0_BRANCH STATUS
  Log:
  Propose a backport.
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  No                   revision
  No                   revision
  1.751.2.965 +7 -1      httpd-2.0/STATUS
  
  Index: STATUS
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /home/cvs/httpd-2.0/STATUS,v
  retrieving revision 1.751.2.964
  retrieving revision 1.751.2.965
  diff -u -r1.751.2.964 -r1.751.2.965
  --- STATUS    3 Aug 2004 19:07:03 -0000       1.751.2.964
  +++ STATUS    4 Aug 2004 01:09:00 -0000       1.751.2.965
  @@ -73,6 +73,12 @@
     [ please place file names and revisions from HEAD here, so it is
easy to
       identify exactly what the proposed changes are! ]
   
  +    *) Remove LDAP toolkit specific code from util_ldap and
mod_auth_ldap.
  +         modules/experimental/mod_auth_ldap.c: 1.28
  +         modules/experimental/util_ldap.c: 1.36
  +       +1: minfrin (this requires the apr-util LDAP overhaul to be
ported to
  +                    apr-util v0.9 first)
  +
       *) Add load balancer support to the scoreboard in preparation
for
          load balancing support in mod_proxy.
            include/scoreboard.h: 1.52
  
  
  

Reply via email to