--On Monday, September 13, 2004 5:13 PM +0100 Joe Orton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On platforms with sizeof(int) == sizeof(apr_size_t), the change is a
noop, so no break there.

On other platforms, any indirect lock records which have already been
written to the database by the <=2.0.50 code will be corrupt and
unreadable anyway. If no indirect records have been written it doesn't
matter, and any new records which are written by the new code will be
OK.

Hope that makes sense...

Yup. Thanks! -- justin

Reply via email to