On 10/24/05, Nick Kew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday 24 October 2005 13:22, Joe Orton wrote: > > There was a thread about this previously; just checking for consensus, > > is there any objection to bumping the apr/apr-util version requirements > > to 1.2.x? (1.2.x is already required for mod_dbd, event MP, and it will > > simplify the code to allow unconditional use of 1.2.x features) > > +1
+1 here as well
