On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 09:22:18AM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > I think they do belong and should be included in a release. Namely, I > don't buy Roy's arguments against including them. The potential benefit to > understanding how mod_mbox works outweighs the slight cost of including > some small scripts. If anyone ever bothers to rewrite them, more power to > them. However, not including *any* documentation or examples in the > tarball seems much worse than excluding these scripts. > Agreed - they should at least be kept until there's a usable replacement either in the form of good docs or scripts rewritten to something slightly more commonly used than zsh. If "someone" were to contemplate making a general version of those scripts - what would have a reasonable chance of getting accepted? perl? ksh? C?
vh Mads Toftum -- `Darn it, who spiked my coffee with water?!' - lwall
