Nick Kew wrote:
Yes, it's legal.  The leading slash is implied.  Note: that's leading
slash, which is firmly different to a trailing slash in a path.

for abspath you are correct.  but in general;

      URI         = scheme ":" hier-part [ "?" query ] [ "#" fragment ]

      hier-part   = "//" authority path-abempty
                  / path-absolute
                  / path-rootless
                  / path-empty

injecting a leading slash where an empty (rootless) path is implied will
change the meaning on the fly :(

Bill

Reply via email to