On 4/18/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I know :-). > > But I would like to see this inside the apr framework as it > > seems to me that serf has some acceptance problems here in the httpd > > community. Please correct me if this impression is wrong. > > Your impression is wrong. > > APR ejected the code due to lack of interest / lack of maintenance, and the > general fear of feature creep.
I'll agree with that. Placing serf under APR initially was a mistake in retrospect. > The httpd community has never objected to it. IF you are suggesting putting > wire protocol implementations in APR, I think again you are overloading the > charter. Suggesting that a matching client wire protocol library fits into > the httpd's project goals makes alot more sense. However, that I will disagree with. httpd has never wanted a client library for the same reasons as APR: scope creep. It's outside of our charter. -- justin
