On Wed, 3 May 2006 14:31:06 +0200 (SAST) "Graham Leggett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 3, 2006 1:26 am, Davi Arnaut said: > > >> Then you will end up with code that does not meet the requirements of > >> HTTP, and you will have wasted your time. > > > > Yeah, right! How ? Hey, you are using the Monty Python argument style. > > Can you point to even one requirement of HTTP that my_cache_provider > > wont meet ? > > Yes. Atomic insertions and deletions, the ability to update headers > independantly of body, etc etc, just go back and read the thread. I can't argue with a zombie, you keep repeating the same misunderstands. > Seriously, please move this off list to keep the noise out of people's > inboxes. Fine, I give up. -- Davi Arnaut
