Graham Leggett wrote: > Brian Akins wrote: > >> Not wanting to stir the huge pot o' stuff that is going on here, but >> what are the thoughts of renaming mod_cache to mod_http_cache? >> mod_cache is http specific. This would follow the general ide that >> mod_proxy uses. > > This is a good idea, but thinking about this for a bit, doing so would > be impossible to backport to v2.2 (it would break existing configs). > This in turn would make it more difficult for fixes that would be useful > in v2.2 to be backported, forcing people to wait until v2.4 before > seeing the advantages.
I am okay with forcing people to wait for 2.4. Develop in trunk and/or devel-branches freely. Don't worry about back porting it to the stable branch, IMO. -Paul
