Gonzalo Arana wrote:
On 5/3/06, Brian Akins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is anyone else interested in having a generic cache architecture? (not
http). I have plenty of cases were I re-invent the wheel for caching
various things (IP's, sessions, whatever, etc.). It would be nice to
have a provider based architecture for such things.
I am. How about adding it to apr?
1. this isn't the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list, so your inquiry is 1/2 off topic
2. apr isn't a dumping ground
3. however... to the extent that this really portably solves the backend
storage problem through an array of different providers, that well fits
into apr-util's mission. A *vanilla* data store. The caching mechanics
of request bodies will always belong in httpd.
