huh?
why is the licensing terms stopping us recommending something?
we recommend VC2005 for windows and that it commercial, I don't see
the difference.
(and yes.. I saw mads's comment that this studio is free if your
register)
On 17/06/2006, at 4:56 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 6/16/06, Shanti Subramanyam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here is the patch :
--- README.platforms Fri Jun 16 09:12:33 2006
+++ README.platforms.orig Thu Jun 15 13:13:50 2006
@@ -95,12 +95,4 @@
http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/patches/apply_to_2.0.49/
aix_xlc_optimization.patch
(That patch works with many recent levels of Apache 2+.)
-================
- Solaris:
- On Solaris, much better performance can be achieved by using the
Sun Studio compiler
- instead of gcc. Download the compiler from
-
- http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/tools/sun_studio_tools/
-
- Use the following compiler flags: -XO4 -xchip=generic
Actually, if I read the license, I'm not sure this is a great idea to
recommend now:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/tools/sun_studio_tools/sssent/
Specifically, it says:
---
Permitted Use: Provided that You are a participant of the OpenSolaris
community, You may use the software for Research and Instructional,
Individual, and Commercial Use to design, develop, test, or otherwise
engineer software.
---
In the loosest terms, that *might* be true. But, I'm not quite so
sure.
Roy? -- justin
