Guy Hulbert wrote: > > Absolutely :-). I have no intention of writing any code for perchild if > someone else (undoubtedly far more qualified than I) happens to want to > do it. > > After looking at the code from subversion and having thought a little > more about 'perchild' I can see a few difficulties and I can see good > reasons why it may not have been worked on. >
perchild is an MPM that would be very useful if it was ever done. However, to make it very portable is also not trivial, and it requires additional APR capability which would need to be added as well... One reason for a generic scoreboard would be to help make perchild easier, since we could store the passed fd's in this location alleviating some of the current problems. -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball."
