Jeff Trawick wrote: > A lot of opinions were offered back in August. Some were negative but > I don't see anything that looks like a veto. > > (http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200608.mbox/[EMAIL > PROTECTED]) > > A concern with the logging of server version has since been resolved, > but implementation of the original feature died. Before Sebastian > Nohn's patch is revised to fit in with the subsequent changes, I'd > like to confirm that nobody has a strong (veto) objection to the > feature, and that those in favor clearly out number those against.
I recall the entire thread and two different implementations on trunk and branches/2.2 - and I'm entirely -0 on the feature, but am only -1 if it masks the information in the internal error.log. As I recall your patches split the API so that the MPM will log the 'true version' and that the patch will only affect the externally reported version. If my memory serves - then yes, let's proceed.
