Jim Jagielski wrote: > Anyone mind if I fold it into trunk and maybe have us > consider making it part of 2.2 (even under experimental)?
+1 to trunk! No opinion yet on 2.2 (I'm not a big fan of growing the stable branch since it entirely defeats the drive to release 2.next, ever.) > No docs yet but the code is: > > http://people.apache.org/~jim/code/mod_sed_filter.c > > and the usage is easy: > > AddOutputFilterByType SEDFILTER text/html > Sed s/foo/bar/in > Sed s#monkey(hat)#chimp-$1#i > Sed "s/works/functions/in" > > note that it uses sed line controls, flexible > delims and support regex and simple pattern match (the 'n' > flag... no real sed option there ;) ) Is this sed or pcre syntax? I'm a bit confused :) Although it's sed-ish, is it misleading to confuse the user with the phrase sed considering the unsupported constructs? E.g. I presume the more complex sed language features aren't present. I'm wondering if mod_pcre_filter wouldn't be more accurate?
