On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 8:05 AM, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Feb 14, 2008, at 7:53 AM, Vincent Bray wrote: > > > On 12/02/2008, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> So if you have substituted content that you think will be re- > >> substituted > >> by another rule, then you should flatten. If they are one-shots, or > >> self contained, or in "no way" could result in overlaps, then > >> flattening > >> isn't required. :) > > > > In your example, which of the two Substitute directives needs to have > > the 'f', or is it both? > > > > The first, since it needs to ensure that the just-replaced content > (and all before/after it) finds themselves back into a single bucket. > >
Anyone else +1 for flatten-as-default and providing an option such as: 'q'uick: Substitute more efficiently, but further substitutions will not be able match across the boundaries of this substitutions replacement string. -- Eric Covener [EMAIL PROTECTED]
