On Feb 14, 2008, at 08:50, Eric Covener wrote:
Anyone else +1 for flatten-as-default and providing an option such as:
'q'uick: Substitute more efficiently, but further substitutions will
not be able match across the boundaries of this substitutions
replacement string.
Yes in concept. Don't know how much this affects performance - I had
the impression that it would make things slower. Would it be possible
to flatten only in the event that a second substitute is in fact
called during the course of the same request?
I don't want to make things slower simply because the docs are
confusing. We can make the docs less confusing.
--
Just because your voice reaches halfway around the world doesn't mean
you are wiser than when it reached only to the end of the bar.
Edward R. Murrow
