I haven't given the latest source a spin (due to time problems with exams). Last one I played with seemed to work reasonably well as a single server.
named vhost was broken though (wrowe: how is that coming along? can I give that another run for its money later this week?) If around the same state as when I was messing with it I'd say +1 for beta... it was usable atleast as ~Jorge On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 11:43 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > mod_ftp fans; > > We seem to have identified and solved most post 0.9.1 candidate issues, > so it's time for another try. > > Please fetch up the newly prepared httpd-mod_ftp-0.9.2.tar.gz (available > now), or the win32/netware/os2 suitable package > httpd-mod_ftp-0.9.2-crlf.zip (still needs to sync in the next hour) from: > > http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/mod_ftp/ > > review, take it for a spin, and cast your choice > > [ ] -1 for any release of 0.9.2 > [ ] +1 to release as 0.9.2-alpha > [ ] +1 to release as 0.9.2-beta > [ ] +1 to release as 0.9.2-beta, and ready to tag GA (1.0.0) > > See http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/mod_ftp/tags/0.9.2/STATUS-FTP > identifying several issues (I don't plan to vote for better than -beta > just yet). Supporting -beta means +1 to -alpha instead if that's the > majority opinion. > > For getting started, > > http://httpd.apache.org/mod_ftp/ > > and > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/mod_ftp/tags/0.9.2/README-FTP > > Bill > > > > >
