Den Tuesday 19 August 2008 08:16:08 skrev Kaspar Brand: > Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > At the moment we have 9 entries in the CHANGES file for 2.2.10 and > > there are 5 more proposals in the STATUS file that are missing only > > one vote. I think if get these done we also have enough stuff from > > pure httpd point of view that warrants a release. WDYT? > > May I use this occasion to ask if there's still a chance of getting a > backport of SNI accepted for 2.2.x? Following suggestions from Joe, I > went through all relevant SSL* config directives and posted my findings > in two parts on 9th/18th June: > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200806.mbox/%3c484CBAA6. >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200806.mbox/%3c48592955. >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > The patch I posted on 18 June introduced a regression, however, so I > posted an updated version on 26th June: > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200806.mbox/%3c4863C04C. >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > That's the version I still consider suitable for check-in to trunk > (attached again for convenience). A backport to 2.2.x is available at > > http://sni.velox.ch/httpd-2.2.x-sni.diff > > If, on the other hand, people think that SNI isn't important enough for > 2.2.x, then I'd be glad to hear that as well (it doesn't make sense to > repeatedly nag the list about that topic, I think). > > Thanks, > Kaspar
FYI: This patch is applied in Mandriva Linux.
