Jeff Trawick wrote: > > (brain dump since I have to get some real work done)
:) > Here's a patch to get the proper header files included for the apr 0.9.x > compatibility code. > > http://people.apache.org/~trawick/fcgid_2.0.x_detect.patch > > Is it worth the trouble to make that ugly code (copy of apr_shm_remove) > compile correctly? Should we just add that function to the > not-anally-versioned APR 0.9.x? Sure. Let's get it building correctly without updating 0.9.x; it serves as a good example of this module build schema. The four lines of fchmod example in configure.apxs be deleted. And it appears there is a stray ')' at the end of your revised APACHE_MODULE line. Just need to strip all these checks when brought into httpd trunk, if we do so. > My configure.apxs build currently fails to find mod_fcgid.a; that > doesn't seem to be related to the patch, but that knowledge > brings only so much happiness... And I haven't tried building in-tree. :) How does modules.mk from .apxs compare with a normal modules.mk that would exist in one of your modules/ subdirectories of a normal 2.0 build? Is it invoking the right libtool (copied into apr/build/)? There are some flaws in the httpd-2.0 installation still, particularly if apr ends up installed in a different directory than httpd.
