On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Graham Leggett <minf...@sharp.fm> wrote:
> Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > Yeah, but do we want to require 1.4, which means backporting the > > pollcb stuff, or do we want to require 2.0, which means httpd 2.4 > > will be pushed out even further...? > > I'd say backport the pollcb stuff. httpd v2.3.x alphas are out the door, > while apr v2.x alphas aren't. > I generally agree with backporting pollcb to apr 1.4.x, as long as there is interest in supporting Simple as a production MPM in the 2.4.x timeframe (no idea here of the status of Simple).
