On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Jeff Trawick <traw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Graham Leggett <minf...@sharp.fm> wrote: > >> Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> > Yeah, but do we want to require 1.4, which means backporting the >> > pollcb stuff, or do we want to require 2.0, which means httpd 2.4 >> > will be pushed out even further...? >> >> I'd say backport the pollcb stuff. httpd v2.3.x alphas are out the door, >> while apr v2.x alphas aren't. >> > > I generally agree with backporting pollcb to apr 1.4.x > you guys are confusing me ;) pollcb is in 1.3.x even; AFAIK it is just APR_POLLSET_NODEFAULT that simple wants from later APR
