On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote:
> > On Oct 1, 2009, at 11:14 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Jeff Trawick <traw...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Graham Leggett <minf...@sharp.fm> wrote: >> Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> > Yeah, but do we want to require 1.4, which means backporting the >> > pollcb stuff, or do we want to require 2.0, which means httpd 2.4 >> > will be pushed out even further...? >> >> I'd say backport the pollcb stuff. httpd v2.3.x alphas are out the door, >> while apr v2.x alphas aren't. >> >> I generally agree with backporting pollcb to apr 1.4.x >> >> you guys are confusing me ;) >> >> pollcb is in 1.3.x even; AFAIK it is just APR_POLLSET_NODEFAULT that >> simple wants from later APR >> >> > > It's this: > > int good_methods[] = {APR_POLLSET_KQUEUE, APR_POLLSET_PORT, > APR_POLLSET_EPOLL}; > > and the use of apr_pollcb_create_ex() > > yeah