On 21 Mar 2010, at 9:52 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
It was reviewed and vetoed by wrowe [not the purpose, but the
effect] and that
veto of trunk was not addressed before proposing this patch; the
backport
proposal was invalid so the results of the backport vote are equally
invalid.
Please revert, today, or I'm happy to back it out the entire mess on
both trunk
and 2.2 myself tomorrow, until a sensible hack is proposed.
This is the procedural thread. We'll take up the veto on the
original thread
you appear to have ignored.
Can you point out the message in which you veto'ed this?
Regards,
Graham
--
