I re-read this thread and see that we have a request in progress, so this isn't RFC approved behavior. Sorry for the noise.
Greg On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Rainer Jung <[email protected]>wrote: > On 23.03.2010 15:30, Jeff Trawick wrote: > >> >>>>> Is that expected behaviour? It doesn't seem reproducible for the worker >>>>> MPM. >>>>> The behaviour has been observed using extreme spare rules in order to >>>>> make >>>>> processes shut down often, but it still seems not right. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Is this the currently-unhandled situation discussed in this thread? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200711.mbox/%[email protected]%3e >>>> >>>> Perhaps Event's special handling for keepalive connections results in >>>> the window being encountered more often? >>>> >>> >>> I'd say yes. I know from the packet trace, that the previous response on >>> the >>> same connection got "Connection: Keep-Alive". But from the time gap of >>> about >>> 0.5 seconds between receving the next request and sending the FIN, I >>> guess, >>> that the child was not already in the process of shutting down, when the >>> previous "Connection: Keep-Alive" response was send. >> >>
