On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: > Geez, Eric. No wonder people don't want to contribute to httpd, when they > run into an attitude like yours. That dismissiveness makes me embarressed > for our community.
Congeniality lesson noted, but not in the way you probably intended. > There is zero reason for us to avoid putting deflate into the default > configuration. > It is also very arguable that we should leave it off. Having trouble reconciling these statements. I sympathize with the position that the pros outweigh the cons [of deflate in the default conf], but not that there aren't any cons. I think there's a lot of prerequisite work to be done before enabling this on the type of unsuspecting users who wouldn't have ever thought about it in the first place (the beneficiaries). I still strongly disagree that lack of deflate in the "default build" or default conf is a significant gate. > I think others have > argued well to enable it by default, while you've simply dismissed them with > your holier-than-thou attitude and lack of any solid rationale. I see the thread differently, notably with respect to where it started and what you quoted. But I appreciate your opinion nonetheless. -- Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com
