On 3 Jun 2010, at 12:30, Rainer Jung wrote: > Reading the feedback on the modules list I posted got me into thinking: > > 1) Should static module linking be still the default for httpd building?
No. But we shouldn't change that within the 2.2.x line. > 2) Which pre-cooked sets of modules to provide via configure? A question to which a satisfactory answer is elusive. But with dynamic linking we can sidestep the issue by building everything considered stable by default, and excluding only modules that are considered less-than mature. IMHO :) -- Nick Kew
