On 2010-06-21 at 14:32, Stefan Fritsch <[email protected]> wrote: > On Monday 21 June 2010, Dan Poirier wrote: >> But is there any reason why we couldn't just make "all" actually >> build all? And I would suggest if there's not a really good >> reason, we should just fix "all" to do what it obviously should. >> That should be easy now, just delete the current "all" and rename >> the new "reallyall" to "all". > > I would prefer "all" to be everything except those modules that are > only useful for developers:
... > BTW, is there a better name for "reallyall" that makes clear that it > is geared towards developers? I thought "lint" (suggested by someone > on the list) didn't sound descriptive enough to me. But maybe it's > still better than "reallyall". If that's the motivation, how about "maintainer", since we already have --enable-maintainer-mode? Dan
