On 6/21/2010 3:57 PM, Dan Poirier wrote: > On 2010-06-21 at 14:32, Stefan Fritsch <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Monday 21 June 2010, Dan Poirier wrote: >>> But is there any reason why we couldn't just make "all" actually >>> build all? And I would suggest if there's not a really good >>> reason, we should just fix "all" to do what it obviously should. >>> That should be easy now, just delete the current "all" and rename >>> the new "reallyall" to "all". >> >> I would prefer "all" to be everything except those modules that are >> only useful for developers:
We appear to be overthinking this. 'all' should be ALL. Everything except unstable/dev/test modules should be 'most'. If we have some further, optimial module lists, those can become new categories.
