On 2/4/2011 7:20 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > On Feb 3, 2011, at 6:03 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > >> On 2/3/2011 5:01 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote: >>> On Thursday 03 February 2011, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>>> Don't we also need to now start linking against lresolv?? >>>> >>>> ..../dev/httpd-git-trunk/srclib/apr-util/libaprutil-1.la -lexpat >>>> -liconv >>>> /Users/jim/src/asf/code/dev/httpd-git-trunk/srclib/apr/libapr-1.la >>>> -lpthread Undefined symbols: >>>> "_res_9_init", referenced from: >>>> _main in libmain.a(main.o) >>>> ld: symbol(s) not found >>>> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status >>>> make[1]: *** [httpd] Error 1 >>>> make: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 >>>> >>>> after this patch, build now breaks (at least os OS X). >>> >>> I have read the AC_SEARCH_LIBS docs [1] to mean that it adds -lresolv >>> automatically to LIBS if needed. On my system, the test result is >>> "none needed", so I can't really test this. >> >> It's probably not needed because that platform picks up the global namespace, >> and resolv was already snagged by loading libapr-1.so from httpd. > > Was it? From what I can see, only httpd uses res_init which in > many systems is *just* in lresolv...
Did Stefan's patch help? We throw away LIBS/LDFLAGS etc fairly often, and they may need to be explicitly added.
