On Feb 4, 2011, at 4:14 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 2/4/2011 2:54 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote: >>> >>> +1 here as well, if this is to be addressed at all, the portability >>> layer seems like the correct place to do it, if desired by the >>> app. >> >> Would you prefer os/unix or APR? I am also happy to simply revert if >> that is the majority opinion. > > I suspect that a generic apr '_refresh' function would be most useful > across the board, others might disagree. >
Isn't APR for "portability"? All I see is a single function call... If we have to pollute something with this res_init(), then httpd is likely the better place than expanding APR even more beyond being a "simple" portable runtime ;) But I'm fine either way... as long as it builds and links ;)
