On 9/29/2011 7:30 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > > This is well past the point where one needs to know the Listen > configuration, exact problem symptom, etc. ;) Either way it seems > that there were some oddities around the presence/absence of > IPV6_V6ONLY. In its absence APR should have been returning > APR_ENOTIMPL instead of not-set for a query, then httpd would have > grown different logic.
Right. I discovered that loading an IPv6 APR against a IPv4 compiled libhttpd.dll on Win32 is a very lethal combination. The buffer sizes, for one, are all wrong. Chalk these complaints about APR 1.x up to user-error.
