On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 1:29 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: > On 1/25/2012 5:05 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. asked: >>> >>> [ ] Include apr-util 1.4.1 in any httpd 2.2.x >>> [ ] Remain at apr-util 1.3.12 in any httpd 2.2.x > > So far, the tally remains > > 1.4.1 - jim, wrowe > 1.3.12 - [none] > > Anyone else? Or do people believe this sort of change isn't > worth some discussion/vote? Lazy consensus/silence can lead > to an assortment of assumptions.
I'm leaning towards 1.3.12 for the bundled version. When there's 1.4.2 with rough edges resolved, that's another matter. I need to revisit the theory of 2.2/1.3.12 and 2.4/1.4.1 collision. I guess that implies certain non-default layouts?
