On 28 Jan 2012, at 8:29 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: >>> [ ] Include apr-util 1.4.1 in any httpd 2.2.x >>> [ ] Remain at apr-util 1.3.12 in any httpd 2.2.x > > So far, the tally remains > > 1.4.1 - jim, wrowe > 1.3.12 - [none] > > Anyone else? Or do people believe this sort of change isn't > worth some discussion/vote? Lazy consensus/silence can lead > to an assortment of assumptions.
Another +1 for v1.4.1. We have a very strict ABI policy for apr and apr-util which should mean that within reason v1.4.1 should contain additions and bugfixes over v1.3.12, but no changes of existing functionality, and the bump is therefore low risk. Regards, Graham --
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
