On Saturday 28 January 2012, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 1/25/2012 5:05 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. asked: > >> [ ] Include apr-util 1.4.1 in any httpd 2.2.x > >> [ ] Remain at apr-util 1.3.12 in any httpd 2.2.x > > So far, the tally remains > > 1.4.1 - jim, wrowe > 1.3.12 - [none] > > Anyone else? Or do people believe this sort of change isn't > worth some discussion/vote? Lazy consensus/silence can lead > to an assortment of assumptions.
I am in favor of 1.4.1, too. The likelyhood for breakage seems low enough.
