On 3/15/2012 4:07 AM, Issac Goldstand wrote:
>
> Any chance you can elaborate on "It appears MSDN documentation was not
> our friend... etc"?
>From MSDN and my understanding of the new wait-on-event API, it appeared
that MSDN suggested these would be defaults and we would have to adjust
for apr's assumptions (in server/mpm/winnt/child.c);
/* Restore the state corresponding to apr_os_sock_make's default
* assumption of timeout -1 (really, a flaw of os_sock_make and
* os_sock_put that it does not query to determine ->timeout).
* XXX: Upon a fix to APR, these three statements should disappear.
*/
ioctlsocket(context->accept_socket, FIONBIO, &zero);
setsockopt(context->accept_socket, SOL_SOCKET, SO_RCVTIMEO,
(char *) &zero, sizeof(zero));
setsockopt(context->accept_socket, SOL_SOCKET, SO_SNDTIMEO,
(char *) &zero, sizeof(zero));
but no, apparently this is not the case, and these can't be assumed to be
appropriate for both AcceptEx and accept style logic.
