Gregg, I believe these overrides are either not needed at all, or are not needed in specific cases, and have yet to determine which is the case that the users are experiencing.
Is anyone complaining about AcceptFilter data or connection? If not, then these lines of code simply need to be dodged for AcceptFilter none. On 3/15/2012 6:06 AM, Gregg Smith wrote: > Bill, > > Us Windows folk would be ecstatic! It is affecting a few noisy users, then > there's the > silent masses :) > Not sure what APR quirks, refresh my memory. > I'm +1 for a APU 1.4.2 also, crypto not building for static lib throws a > decent sized > monkey wrench into the httpd build. Then maybe we can connect the dots in the > .dsw files > and in makefile.win (which you have started sort of). > > Gregg > > On 3/14/2012 10:29 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: >> On 3/14/2012 2:36 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>> In the attempts to keep the momentum going, I'd like to push for >>> a httpd 2.4.2 release Real Soon Now. >> Then this afternoon I'll propose a 'really small patch' around >> 'the win32 issue' and ask folks who have had problems, and those who >> have not, to test it out. It appears MSDN documentation was not our >> friend and their directives were misplaced, and the patch should drop >> some code (not used back in 2.2) which might be the underlying cause >> of Steffan and crew's issues. >> >> We would probably hear back within the day, so windows folks would >> be very happy with a T&R sometime Friday-Monday. I just can't recall >> offhand if all the win32 quirks in apr were resolved in 1.4.6, or >> a new T&R is still needed on that side? >> > >
